Sir! Wow. This the best source of information that I can use. Sorry the words fail. Your analysis and conclusions are prophetic. ððĪŠððð Out
While o1 may not be great at most of things as in the post (I did not explore much anything else with o1 yet), but I would vouch o1 for its coding capability. It is outstanding... To add perspective, a hybrid approach for coding works 10x better than just one platform. e.g. I use claude > perplexity > o1 > then again claude to perfect my code. It works great... perplexity is in loop for research and it does a good job.
Interesting. I am just starting to use o1 for coding.
I like the idea of mixing and matching tools. Will have to try. You can also run your query in o1, get a pass of code, then put it in VSCode/continue to use other tools, etc.
Sir! Wow. This the best source of information that I can use. Sorry the words fail. Your analysis and conclusions are prophetic. ððĪŠððð Out
While o1 may not be great at most of things as in the post (I did not explore much anything else with o1 yet), but I would vouch o1 for its coding capability. It is outstanding... To add perspective, a hybrid approach for coding works 10x better than just one platform. e.g. I use claude > perplexity > o1 > then again claude to perfect my code. It works great... perplexity is in loop for research and it does a good job.
Interesting. I am just starting to use o1 for coding.
I like the idea of mixing and matching tools. Will have to try. You can also run your query in o1, get a pass of code, then put it in VSCode/continue to use other tools, etc.
As it stands right now, with o1 limitations, what would be the best stable choice of llm for system 2 programming?
o1 is literally the only game in town for system 2 thinking. It's your go-to for coding and math and complex queries.
Simpler queries, general knowledge and help with writing are best done on other models, like Claude 3.5 Sonnet.